https://doi.org/10.4081/tz.2022.108
Does size matter? Bat diversity and the use of rock shelters in Brazil
Submitted: 27 February 2022
Accepted: 5 April 2023
Published: 25 May 2023
Accepted: 5 April 2023
Abstract Views: 871
PDF: 308
HTML: 18
HTML: 18
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
A positive correlation between cave size and bat diversity has been recorded by some authors for different cave areas in South America. We analyzed published and otherwise available data from three Brazilian karst areas and phytogeography domains, including NE and SE Atlantic Forest and Cerrado (savannah-like vegetation), encompassing a wide range of cave sizes. We found no such correlation, as expected in view of previous observations by researchers and speleologists. We discuss the ecological implications of different ways to measure bat diversity, i.e. the accumulative number of species (sequential use of caves) vs. the number of species at a given occasion (species in actual cohabitation) vs. bat abundance (numbers of individuals), as well as speleological topics related to the concept of caves (based on an anthropomorphic definition, not applicable to other species), the problems of estimating topographic variables such as cave area and volume, and the value of including cave temperatures in the analyses. Multiple interacting variables may influence the composition of cave bat communities and bat species richness and abundance. The most important ones would be the density of caves in a given area (related to lithology – calcareous vs. siliciclastic caves), regional climates, and degree of preservation of epigean habitat. Cave morphology, number and size of entrances, and presence of water bodies, as well as interactions with other species, must also be considered. In conclusion, as a general statement for tropical and subtropical bats, cave size (in the human sense) by itself does not matter, except perhaps for one-off situations. Finally, a brief overview of the diversity of cave bats in Brazil is presented.
Arnone IS. 2008. Estudo da comunidade de morcegos na área cárstica do Alto Ribeira – SP. Uma comparação com 1980. Unpublished M. Sc. Dissertation. Instituto de Biociências da USP, São Paulo, Brasil. 117 pp.
Arnone IS, Trajano E, Pulchério-Leite A, Passos FC. 2016. Long-distance movement by a great fruit-eating bat, Artibeus lituratus (Olfers, 1818), in southeastern Brazil (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae): evidence for migration in Neotropical bats? Biota Neotropica. 16:e0026. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2015-0026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2015-0026
Barr TC. 1968. Cave ecology and the evolution of troglobites. Evolutionary Biology. 2:35–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8094-8_2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8094-8_2
Barros JS, Bernard E, Ferreir RL. 2020. Ecological preferences of Neotropical cave bats in roost site selection and their implications for conservation. Basic and Applied Ecology. 45:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2020.03.007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2020.03.007
Bichuette ME, Gimenez EA, Arnone IS, Trajano E. 2018. An important site for conservation of bats in Brazil: Passa Três cave, São Domingos karst area, with an updated checklist for Distrito Federal (DF) and Goiás state. Subterranean Biology. 28:39–51. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.28.31801
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.28.31801
Bonacci O. 2009. Karst Landscape Ecohydrology, p. 781–790. In: International Symposium on Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering. Ohrid, Macedonia.
Bredt A, Uieda W, Magalhães D. 1999. Morcegos cavernícolas da região do Distrito Federal, centro-oeste do Brasil (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 16:731–77. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751999000300012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751999000300012
Cajaiba RL. 2014. Morcegos (Mammalia, Chiroptera) em cavernas no município de Uruará, Pará, norte do Brasil. Biota Amazônia. 4:81–6. https://doi.org/10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v4n1p81-86
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v4n1p81-86
Cajaiba RL, Périco E, Silva WB, Vieira TB, Santos M. 2021. Are neotropical cave-bats good landscape integrity indicators? Some clues when exploring the cross-scale interactions between underground and above-ground ecosystems. Ecological Indicators. 122:107258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107258
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107258
Calux A. 2018. Problemas inerentes aos métodos de cálculo do volume. Espeleometria no contexto do licenciamento ambiental. Ouro Preto, Brasil: Simpósio de espeleologia e legislação ambiental. Available from: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/centros-de-pesquisa/cecav/publicacoes/espeleologia_e_licenciamento_ambiental.pdf
Camacho A. 1992. A classification of the aquatic and terrestrial subterranean environment and their associated fauna. The natural history of biospeleology. Madrid, Spain: Monografias del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. 7:57–103.
Campanhã RAC, Fowler HG. 1993. Roosting assemblages of bats in arenitic caves in remnant fragments of Atlantic Forest in southeastern Brazil. Biotropica. 25:362–5. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388798
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388798
Chabert C, Watson RA. 1981. Mapping and measuring caves; a conceptual analysis. The NSS Bulletin. 43:3–11.
Dalquest WW, Walton DW. 1970. Diurnal retreats of bats. In: Slaughter BH, Walton DW, (eds). About bats. A chiropteran symposium). Dallas, USA: Southern Methodist University Press. p. 162–87.
Esbérard CEL, Motta JAO, Perigo C. 2005. Morcegos cavernícolas da área de Proteção Ambiental (APA) Nascentes do Rio Vermelho, Goiás. Revista Brasileira de Zoociências. 7:311–25.
Faria D, Paciencia MLB, Dixo M, Laps MRR, Baumgarten J. 2007. Ferns, frogs, lizards, birds and bats in forest fragments and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic forest, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation. 16:2335–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9189-z
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9189-z
Felix S, Novaes RLM, Souza RF, Avilla LS. 2016. Bat assemblage in a karstic area from northern Brazil: seven new occurrences for Tocantins state, including the first record of Glyphonycteris sylvestris Thomas, 1896 for the Cerrado. Check List. 12:1999. https://doi.org/10.15560/12.6.1999
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15560/12.6.1999
Ford D, Williams P. 2007. Karst Hydrology and Geomorphology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. 562 pp.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118684986
Gregorin R, Mendes LF. 1999. Sobre quirópteros (Emballonuridae, Phyllostomidae, Natalidae) de duas cavernas da Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brasil. Iheringia, sér. Zoologia. 86:121–4.
Guimarães MM, Ferreira RL. 2014. Morcegos cavernícolas do Brasil: novos registros e desafios para conservação. Revista Brasileira de Espeleologia, Brasília. 2:1–33.
Kunz TH, Reichard JD. 2010. Status review of the little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) and determination that immediate listing under the endangered species act is scientifically and legally warranted. Boston, USA: Boston University’s Center for Ecology and Conservation Biology. 30 pp.
Lizarro D, Aguirre LF, Pérez-Zubieta JC, Vargas A, M. Isabel Galarza MI. THERYA, 2020. Characterization of caves as bat roosts in the brazilian-paranense biogeographic region of Bolivia. Therya 11:390-7. https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-20-1008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-20-1008
Menzel MA, Menzel JM, Carter TC, Ford WM, Edwards JW. 2001. Review of the forest habitat relationships of the Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis). General Technical Report NE-284, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 21 pp.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2737/NE-GTR-284
Nowak RM. 1994. Walker´s Bats of the World. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press. 287 pp.
Otálora-Ardila A, Torres JM, Barbier E, Pimentel NT, Leal ESB, Bernard E. 2019. Thermally-assisted monitoring of bat abundance in an exceptional cave in Brazil’s Caatinga drylands. Acta Chiropterologica. 21:411–23. https://doi.org/10.3161/15081109ACC2019.21.2.016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3161/15081109ACC2019.21.2.016
Portella AS. 2010. Morcegos cavernícolas e relação parasita-hospedeiro com moscas estreblídeas em cinco cavernas do Distrito Federal. Unpublished M. Sc. Dissertation. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Brasília, Brasília, Brasil. 66 pp.
Racovita G. 1975. La classification topoclimatique des cavités souterraines. Travaux du Institut de Spéologie “Emil Racovitza”. 14:197–216.
Rubbioli E, Auler A, Menin D, Brandi R. 2019. Cavernas. Atlas do Brasil subterrâneo. Brasília, Brasil: Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. 340 pp.
Rubbioli E, Moura V. 2005. Mapeamento de cavernas. São Paulo, Brasil, RedeSpeleo Brasil. 93 pp.
Sambuichi RHR, Haridasan M. 2007. Recovery of species richness and conservation of native Atlantic forest trees in the cacao plantations of southern Bahia in Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation.16:3681–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9017-x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9017-x
Santos BS. 2001. Ecologia e conservação de morcegos cavernícolas na Bacia Metassedimentar do Rio Pardo – sul da Bahia. Unpublished M.Sc. Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brasil. 66 pp.
Schmaedecke G, Gregolin DT, Torres DF, Bichuette ME. 2019. Quiropterofauna de cavernas areníticas da Formação Botucatu. Espeleo-Tema, Campinas. 29:91–104. Available from: https://www.cavernas.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Espeleo-Tema_v29_n1_091-104.pdf
Silva JPA, Carvalho AR, Motta JAO. 2009. Fauna de morcegos (Mammalia, Chiroptera) em cavernas do bioma Cerrado na região de Indiara (Goiás). Revista Brasileira de Zoociências. 11:209-17. https://doi.org/10.34019/2596-3325.2009.V11.24432
Silva SSP, Guedes PG, Peracchi AL. 2001. Levantamento preliminar dos morcegos do Parque Nacional de Ubajara (Mammalia, Chiroptera), Ceará, Brasil. Revista brasileira de Zoologia. 18:139–44. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752001000100015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752001000100015
Torquetti CG, Silva MX, Talamoni SA. 2017. Differences between caves with and without bats in a Brazilian karst habitat. Zoologia 34:e13732. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.34.e13732
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.34.e13732
Trajano E. 1985. Ecologia de populações de morcegos cavernícolas em uma região cárstica do sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 2:255–320. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751984000100001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751984000100001
Trajano E. 1996. Movements of cave bats in southeastern Brazil, with emphasis on population ecology of common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus (Chiroptera). Biotropica. 28:121–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388777
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388777
Trajano E. 2013. Variações anuais e infra-anuais em ecossistemas subterrâneos: implicações para estudos ambientais e preservação de cavernas. Revista da Biologia. 10:1–7. https://doi.org/10.7594/revbio.10.02.01
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7594/revbio.10.02.01
Trajano E, Carvalho MR. 2017. Towards a biologically meaningful classification of subterranean organisms: a critical analysis of the Schiner-Racovitza system from a historical perspective, difficulties of its application and implications for conservation. Subterranean Biology. 22:1–26. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.22.9759
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.22.9759
Trajano E, Gallão J, Bichuette ME. 2016. Spots of high diversity of troglobites in Brazil: The challenge of measuring subterranean diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation. 25:1805–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1151-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1151-5
Trajano E, Gimenez EA. 1998. Bat community in a cave from eastern Brazil, including a new record of Lionycteris (Phyllostomidae, Glossophaginae). Studies on Neotropical Fauna & Environment. 33:69–75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/snfe.33.2.69.2156
Trajano E, Moreira JRA. 1991. Estudo da fauna de cavernas da Província Espeleológica Arenítica Altamira-Itaituba, PA. Revista Brasileira Biologia. 51:13–29.
Vargas-Mena JC, Cordero-Schmidt E, Rodriguez-Herrera B, Medellín R, Bento DM, Venticinque E. 2020. Inside or out? Cave size and landscape effects on cave-roosting bat assemblages in Brazilian Caatinga caves. Journal of Mammalogy. 101:464–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz206
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz206
Uieda, W, Sazima I, Storti Filho A. 1980. Aspectos da biologia alimentar do morcego Furipterus horrens (Mammalia, Chiroptera, Furipteridae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 40:59–66.
Zortéa M., Bastos NA, Acioli TC. 2015. The bat fauna of the Kararaô and Kararaô Novo caves in the area under the influence of the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, in Pará, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 75:168–73. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.00414BM
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.00414BM
How to Cite
Trajano, E., & Etges, M. F. (2023). Does size matter? Bat diversity and the use of rock shelters in Brazil. Tropical Zoology, 35(3-4). https://doi.org/10.4081/tz.2022.108
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.